![]() ![]() Yabanoglu H, Caliskan K, Ozgur Aytac H, Turk E, Karagulle E, Kayaselcuk F et al (2014) Unusual findings in appendectomy specimens of adults: retrospective analyses of 1466 patients and a review of literature. BMC Surg 7:17Ĭhamisa I (2009) A clinicopathological review of 324 appendices removed for acute appendicitis in Durban, South Africa: a retrospective analysis. Jones AE, Phillips AW, Jarvis JR, Sargen K (2007) The value of routine histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens. 1076–1092ĭuzgun AP, Moran M, Uzun S, Ozmen MM, Ozer VM, Seckin S, Coskun F (2004) Unusual findings in appendicectomy specimens: evaluation of 2458 cases and review of the literature. In: Russell RC, Williams NS, Bulstrode CJ (eds) Bailey and Love’s short practice of surgery, 23 th edn. Russell RC, Williams NS, Bulstrode CJ (2000) The vermiform appendix. In: Schwartz SI (ed) Principles of surgery. ![]() Arch Path Lab Med 125(6):759–764Ĭonnor SJ, Hanna GB, Frizell FA (1998) Appendiceal tumors. Nemeth L, Reen DJ, O’Briain D, McDermott M, Pui P (2001) Evidence of an inflammatory pathologic condition in “normal” appendices following emergency appendectomy. Ĭhan W, Fu KH (1987) Value of routine histopathological examination of appendices in Hong Kong. The Royal College of Pathologists 2005 Histopathology and Cytopathology of limited or no clinical value 2nd edition. Matthyssens LE, Ziol M, Barrat C, Champault GG (2006) Routine surgical pathology in general surgery. World J Gastroenterol 17(15):1961–1970Įmre A, Akbulut S, Bozdag Z, Yilmaz M, Kanlioz M, Emre R et al (2013) Routine histopathologic examination of appendectomy specimens: retrospective analysis of 1255 patients. Arch Surg 137(7):799–804Īkbulut S, Tas M, Sogutcu N, Arikanoglu Z, Basbug M, Ulku A, Semur H, Yagmur Y (2011) Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a retrospective analysis and literature review. Although all of the appendectomy samples were normal macroscopically, data from this study suggest that all specimens should be sent for routine investigation.įlum DR, Koepsell T (2002) The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. All of the patients diagnosed with malignancy were alive reported no problems at their follow-ups. Patients with parasitic diseases also underwent anthelmintic treatment, while chemotherapy was administered to the patient with lymphoma. All of the malignant tumors were localized in the distal end of the appendix, and all of the patients were treated with appendectomy. The unusual findings were as follows: 16 fibrous obliteration, 11 Enterobius vermicularis, 2 schistosomiasis, 3 appendiceal neuroma, 2 granulomatous appendicitis, 1 Crohn’s disease, 3 chronic appendicitis, 1 endometriosis, 2 hyperplastic polyps, 9 mucinous cystadenoma (+mucocele), 8 carcinoid tumors, and 1 lymphoma. The rare histopathological findings of 59 patients were examined. Patients’ age, gender, pathology reports, and postoperation follow-ups were recorded. Rare findings were found in 59 (3 %) patients, and these were evaluated in detail. The files of 1970 patients undergoing appendectomy due to the diagnosis of acute appendicitis between March 2012 and March 2016 were retrospectively investigated. ![]() This study aimed to examine rare findings in the histopathologic examinations of specimens of patients undergoing appendectomy due to the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Diseases and tumors of the appendix vermiformis are very rare, except for acute appendicitis. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |